[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47B8A7B9.2060500@zytor.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 13:31:37 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pavel@...e.cz,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Re: 2.6.25-rc2-mm1 (wakeup)
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>
> But I assume in less obvious way.
> It is a bit more intuitive to error out on missing
> -m32 support than gcc failing to support .code16
> or some other inline assembler magic.
>
No, you will get the message "the selected CPU doesn't support the
x86-64 architecture".
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists