[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080218071229.GA1459@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 08:12:29 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>, sct@...hat.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] fs/jbd/journal.c: cleanups
* Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com> wrote:
> > This patch contains the following cleanups:
> > - make the following needlessly global function static:
> > - journal_check_used_features()
> > - remove the following unused EXPORT_SYMBOL's:
> > - journal_set_features
> > - journal_update_superblock
>
> Nack. I don't object to un-exporting journal_update_superblock(),
> because that is pretty internal, but the other functions are intended
> specifically for use by code outside of JBD. For example, the journal
> checksum patch for ext3/4 uses journal_set_features() to turn on
> features in the JBD superblock.
>
> Similarly, for 64-bit support in ext4 uses journal_set_features() to
> set a 64-bit feature flag in the journal superblock.
that's an invalid excuse for the benefit of out-of-tree forks: reality
is that you can export those functions in the "journal checksum patch"
just fine. So you cannot 'nack' a sensible patch on that ground and no
maintainer does it on that ground. Once you get your stuff upstream, you
can re-add the export.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists