[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47B952D3.2030900@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 11:41:39 +0200
From: Török Edwin <edwintorok@...il.com>
To: David Chinner <dgc@....com>
CC: Oliver Pinter <oliver.pntr@...il.com>, xfs@....sgi.com,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: xfsaild causing 30+ wakeups/s on an idle system since 2.6.25-rcX
David Chinner wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 05:51:08PM +0100, Oliver Pinter wrote:
>
>> On 2/17/08, Török Edwin <edwintorok@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> xfsaild is causing many wakeups, a quick investigation shows
>>> xfsaild_push is always
>>> returning 30 msecs timeout value.
>>>
>
> That's a bug
Ok. Your patches fixes the 30+ wakeups :)
> , and has nothing to do with power consumption. ;)
>
I suggest using a sysctl value (such as
/proc/sys/vm/dirty_writeback_centisecs), instead of a hardcoded default
1000.
That would further reduce the wakeups.
>
> I only managed to reproduce this on a lazy superblock counter
> filesystem (i.e. new mkfs and recent kernel),
The filesystem was created in July 2007
> Can you see if the patch below fixes the problem.
Yes, it reduces wakeups to 1/sec.
Thanks,
--Edwin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists