linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 7/7] CGroup API: Update cpusets to use cgroup structured file API

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <47B9560F.3030402@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Mon, 18 Feb 2008 17:55:27 +0800
From:	Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
CC:	Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>, balbir@...ibm.com,
	xemul@...nvz.org, kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com,
	vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 7/7] CGroup API: Update cpusets to use cgroup structured
 file API

Paul Jackson wrote:
> Ok ... this would (I suspect, just from code reading, no bytes were
> harmed in actual testing of this) have a minor change to how white
> space is handled writing integer flags to cpuset files, and a minor
> inconstency.
> 
>  1) Existing cpuset code lets you set a flag (e.g. cpu_exclusive) by doing:
> 	echo '1 rumplestiltskin' > cpu_exclusive   # same as: echo 1 > cpu_exclusive
>     With this patch, that probably fails, EINVAL.
> 
>  2) With this patch, one can write "1" or "1\n" to cpuset integer files, but one
>     cannot successfully write "1\r\n" or "1 " or "1 \n".  However, for the cpuset
>     control files that take strings, not single integers, one -can- have any mix
>     of trailing white space.
> 
> So far as I know, I have no requirement to write rumplestiltskin to cpuset files ;).
> So I'm content to let the minor change in (1) pass without further comment.
> 
> I'd like to recommend consideration of the following patch, to address the
> minor inconsistency of (2), and to save a few bytes of kernel text space.
> 

For memory controller, we have to do this:
	echo -n 4m > memory.limit_in_bytes
'-n' is necessary. This is another inconsistency..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/