[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e2e108260802180301o5c376024t72e649a9debd5157@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 12:01:27 +0100
From: "Bart Van Assche" <bart.vanassche@...il.com>
To: "Erez Zilber" <erezz@...taire.com>
Cc: "FUJITA Tomonori" <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
rdreier@...co.com, James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
vst@...b.net, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
scst-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel
On Feb 18, 2008 10:43 AM, Erez Zilber <erezz@...taire.com> wrote:
> If you use a high value for FirstBurstLength, all (or most) of your data
> will be sent as unsolicited data-out PDUs. These PDUs don't use the RDMA
> engine, so you miss the advantage of IB.
Hello Erez,
Did you notice the e-mail Roland Dreier wrote on Februari 6, 2008 ?
This is what Roland wrote:
> I think the confusion here is caused by a slight misuse of the term
> "RDMA". It is true that all data is always transported over an
> InfiniBand connection when iSER is used, but not all such transfers
> are one-sided RDMA operations; some data can be transferred using
> send/receive operations.
Or: data sent during the first burst is not transferred via one-sided
remote memory reads or writes but via two-sided send/receive
operations. At least on my setup, these operations are as fast as
one-sided remote memory reads or writes. As an example, I obtained the
following numbers on my setup (SDR 4x network);
ib_write_bw: 933 MB/s.
ib_read_bw: 905 MB/s.
ib_send_bw: 931 MB/s.
Bart Van Assche.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists