[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080218124237.0b5f701c@dhcp-252-066.norway.atmel.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 12:42:37 +0100
From: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...el.com>
To: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp>
Cc: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>,
spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: atmel_spi clock polarity
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 22:32:52 +0900 (JST)
Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp> wrote:
> Here is my quick workaround for this problem. It makes all CSRn.CPOL
> match for the transfer before activating chipselect. I'm not quite
> sure my analysis is correct, and there might be better solution.
> Could you give me any comments?
I'm not sure if I fully understand what problem you're seeing. Is the
clock state wrong when the chip select is activated? If so, does the
patch below help?
Haavard
diff --git a/drivers/spi/atmel_spi.c b/drivers/spi/atmel_spi.c
index 293b7ca..4f19b82 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/atmel_spi.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/atmel_spi.c
@@ -90,6 +90,7 @@ static void cs_activate(struct atmel_spi *as, struct spi_device *spi)
mr = spi_readl(as, MR);
mr = SPI_BFINS(PCS, ~(1 << spi->chip_select), mr);
+ spi_writel(as, MR, mr);
dev_dbg(&spi->dev, "activate %u%s, mr %08x\n",
gpio, active ? " (high)" : "",
@@ -97,7 +98,6 @@ static void cs_activate(struct atmel_spi *as, struct spi_device *spi)
if (!(cpu_is_at91rm9200() && spi->chip_select == 0))
gpio_set_value(gpio, active);
- spi_writel(as, MR, mr);
}
static void cs_deactivate(struct atmel_spi *as, struct spi_device *spi)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists