[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47B97BD5.5070209@garzik.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 07:36:37 -0500
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
CC: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
kkeil@...e.de, isdn4linux@...tserv.isdn4linux.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Plans for mISDN? Was: [PATCH 00/14] [ISDN] ...
Andi Kleen wrote:
> Merging essentially untested patches does not seem like a good strategy.
Agreed. I don't want my stuff going in without knowing it works.
> And there is definitely still a large ISDN user base too.
This is what I'm curious about. My personal guess is that there is a
lot of ISDN hardware available, but not necessarily the telco ISDN
availability. But I have no way to gauge the Linux ISDN userbase size
(beyond responses from isdn maintainers and list users), so I'm a poor
judge.
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists