lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <12131.1203344830@redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 18 Feb 2008 14:27:10 +0000
From:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:	Geert Uytterhoeven <Geert.Uytterhoeven@...ycom.com>
Cc:	dhowells@...hat.com, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
	Roel Kluin <12o3l@...cali.nl>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, cbe-oss-dev@...abs.org,
	linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Fix Unlikely(x) == y

Geert Uytterhoeven <Geert.Uytterhoeven@...ycom.com> wrote:

> Hence shouldn't we ask the gcc people what's the purpose of
> __builtin_expect(), if it doesn't live up to its promise?

__builtin_expect() is useful on FRV where you _have_ to give each branch and
conditional branch instruction a measure of probability whether the branch
will be taken.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ