linux-kernel - Re: Regression with sched yield

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47B99AB4.3020604@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Mon, 18 Feb 2008 20:18:20 +0530
From:	Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
	linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Regression with sched yield - 2.6.25-rc2-mm1

Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 17:47 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was looking at the 45% regression reported by Yanmin, when while running the
>> test, I ran into
>>
>> 1:mon> t
>> [c0000000e7677da0] c000000000067de0 .sys_sched_yield+0x6c/0xbc
>> [c0000000e7677e30] c000000000008748 syscall_exit+0x0/0x40
>> --- Exception: c01 (System Call) at 00000400001d09e4
>> SP (4000664cb10) is in userspace
>> 1:mon> r
>> R00 = 0000000000000001   R16 = 0000000000000000
>> R01 = c0000000e7677d20   R17 = 0000000000000000
>> R02 = c000000000949490   R18 = 00000000100c5290
>> R03 = 0000000000000008   R19 = 0000000000000000
>> R04 = 0000000010036370   R20 = 0000000010040bc0
>> R05 = 0000000000000000   R21 = 0000000000000000
>> R06 = 0000000000000001   R22 = 0000000000000002
>> R07 = 000000000000002d   R23 = 0000000000000008
>> R08 = 0000000000000000   R24 = 00000000100387c0
>> R09 = 0000000000000000   R25 = 0000000010038c20
>> R10 = c0000000e5c12520   R26 = 00000000100363e8
>> R11 = c0000000e5c12558   R27 = 0000000010038c50
>> R12 = 800000000000f032   R28 = 0000000000360000
>> R13 = c00000000083c300   R29 = c000000000b43b80
>> R14 = 0000040000ee6e0d   R30 = c0000000008ba608
>> R15 = 0000000000000000   R31 = c000000000b42680
>> pc  = c000000000068e50 .yield_task_fair+0x94/0xc4
>> lr  = c000000000067de0 .sys_sched_yield+0x6c/0xbc
>> msr = 8000000000009032   cr  = 24204482
>> ctr = c000000000068dbc   xer = 0000000020000010   trap =  300
>> dar = 0000000000000050   dsisr = 40000000
>> 1:mon> e
>> cpu 0x1: Vector: 300 (Data Access) at [c0000000e7677aa0]
>>     pc: c000000000068e50: .yield_task_fair+0x94/0xc4
>>     lr: c000000000067de0: .sys_sched_yield+0x6c/0xbc
>>     sp: c0000000e7677d20
>>    msr: 8000000000009032
>>    dar: 50
>>  dsisr: 40000000
>>   current = 0xc0000000e5c12520
>>   paca    = 0xc00000000083c300
>>     pid   = 569, comm = java
>> 1:mon> di %pc
>> c000000000068e50  e9280050      ld      r9,80(r8)
>> c000000000068e54  e80b0050      ld      r0,80(r11)
>> c000000000068e58  7fa90040      cmpld   cr7,r9,r0
>> c000000000068e5c  419c000c      blt     cr7,c000000000068e68    #
>> ..yield_task_fair+0xac/0xc4
>> c000000000068e60  38090001      addi    r0,r9,1
>> c000000000068e64  f80b0050      std     r0,80(r11)
>> c000000000068e68  38210080      addi    r1,r1,128
>> c000000000068e6c  e8010010      ld      r0,16(r1)
>> c000000000068e70  ebc1fff0      ld      r30,-16(r1)
>> c000000000068e74  ebe1fff8      ld      r31,-8(r1)
>> c000000000068e78  7c0803a6      mtlr    r0
>> c000000000068e7c  4e800020      blr
>> c000000000068e80  7c0802a6      mflr    r0
>> c000000000068e84  fba1ffe8      std     r29,-24(r1)
>> c000000000068e88  fbe1fff8      std     r31,-8(r1)
>> c000000000068e8c  f8010010      std     r0,16(r1)
>>
>> Matching assembly and symbols, the code turned out to be around
>>
>>         /*
>>          * Find the rightmost entry in the rbtree:
>>          */
>>         rightmost = __pick_last_entity(&rq->cfs);
>>         /*
>>          * Already in the rightmost position?
>>          */
>>         if (unlikely(rightmost->vruntime < se->vruntime))
>>                 return;
>>
>> It looked like rightmost was set to NULL. I am going to try and find some time
>> in tomorrow and see if I can debug it further.
> 
> 
> Humm, the check that should have avoided that is:
> 
>         /*
>          * Are we the only task in the tree?
>          */
>         if (unlikely(rq->load.weight == curr->se.load.weight))
>                 return;
> 
> 
> But I guess that overlooks rt tasks, they also increase the load.
> So I guess something like this ought to fix it..
> 

Peter,

I don't remember any real time tasks running on the system, so I would be
surprised if that is indeed the case. Having said that, rightmost was indeed
NULL, so I need to figure out why it was. The other question is why would a real
time task be found by sched_yield_fair? I think we need to investigate more.

> diff --git a/kernel/sched_fair.c b/kernel/sched_fair.c
> index b9ade89..83eb30c 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched_fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched_fair.c
> @@ -998,7 +998,7 @@ static void yield_task_fair(struct rq *rq)
>  	/*
>  	 * Already in the rightmost position?
>  	 */
> -	if (unlikely(rightmost->vruntime < se->vruntime))
> +	if (unlikely(!rightmost || rightmost->vruntime < se->vruntime))
>  		return;
> 
>  	/*
> 
> 
> 
> 


-- 
	Warm Regards,
	Balbir Singh
	Linux Technology Center
	IBM, ISTL
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/