linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.25-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.24

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080218085134.4b5c762c@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Date:	Mon, 18 Feb 2008 08:51:34 -0800
From:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.24

On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 12:24:53 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:

> > 
> > question: can we please list the last known good version for each
> > entry? Since these are all regressions (right?) that information
> > ought to be available and usually helps down in narrowing causes..
> 
> Well, this usually is only obvious for the cases in which the

last-known-good SHOULD be obvious. These are regressions right? 
A regression means "version X worked, version Y does not".
If there is no version X, it's not a regression.

Knowing version X is helpful to know how far back to look.



-- 
If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@...ux.intel.com
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/