lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <728865.70879.qm@web36611.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Date:	Sun, 17 Feb 2008 21:17:25 -0800 (PST)
From:	Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
To:	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>, charles.kirsch@...ernet.lu
Cc:	serue@...ibm.com, Andrew Morgan <morgan@...nel.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
	Gerald Combs <gerald@...eshark.org>,
	Gilbert Ramirez <gram@...mni.rice.edu>,
	Guy Harris <guy@...m.mit.edu>
Subject: Re: Possible problem in linux file posix capabilities


--- "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com> wrote:

> ....
> 
> Two quick fixes for you right now (apart from the one you've already
> got :)  would be
> 
> 	1. give wireshark cap_kill, by doing something like
> 
> 		capset cap_kill=ep /bin/wireshark
> 
> 	2. compile a kernel with SECURITY_FILE_CAPABILITIES=n
> 
> Andrew, this pretty much was bound to happen...  we need to figure out
> what our approach here should be.  My preference is still to allow
> signals when p->uid==current->uid so long as !SECURE_NOROOT.  Then as
> people start using secure_noroot process trees they at least must know
> what they're asking for.
> 
> An alternative stance is to accept these things as they come up and try
> to quickly work with the authors of such programs to work around it.  I
> suppose in a security sense that's the superior way :)  But it also
> seems likely to lead to most people choosing option 2 above and not
> bothering to fix the problem.

I probably just missed it when it went by, but do you have some
test cases for file capabilities lying about that I might use?

Thank you.


Casey Schaufler
casey@...aufler-ca.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ