[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <64bb37e0802182244i69f161d0y34ac4cace386147c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 07:44:59 +0100
From: "Torsten Kaiser" <just.for.lkml@...glemail.com>
To: "Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.25-rc2
On Feb 19, 2008 12:54 AM, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> >
> > [ 5282.056415] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > [ 5282.059757] kernel BUG at lib/list_debug.c:33!
>
> Is there any chance that you could try to bisect this, if it's repeatable
> enough for you? Even if you can't bisect it *all* the way, it would be
> really good to do a handful of bisection runs which should already
> hopefully narrow it down a bit more.
>
> Linus
>
It's repeatable, but not in a really reliable way.
So to mark a kernel good I need to compile around 100 KDE packages,
and even then I'm not 100% sure, if it's good or if I was just lucky.
But I did a partly bisect against 2.6.24-rc6-mm1:
2.6.24-rc6 + mm-patches up to (including) git.nfsd -> worked
2.6.24-rc6 + mm-patches up to (including) git.xfs -> crashed
I think the only added patch between rc2-mm1 and rc3-mm2 in that range
where the iommu changes that I later ruled out.
That leaves some git trees as suspects:
git-ocfs2.patch
git-selinux.patch
git-s390.patch
git-sched.patch
git-sh.patch
git-scsi-misc.patch
git-unionfs.patch
git-v9fs.patch
git-watchdog.patch
git-wireless.patch
git-ipwireless_cs.patch
git-x86.patch
git-xfs.patch
(see http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=120276641105256 )
Torsten
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists