[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080219094256.GC7628@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:42:56 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: "David P. Reed" <dpreed@...d.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: define outb_pic and inb_pic to stop using outb_p
and inb_p
* David P. Reed <dpreed@...d.com> wrote:
> x86: define outb_pic and inb_pic to stop using outb_p and inb_p
>
> The delay between io port accesses to the PIC is now defined using
> outb_pic and inb_pic. This fix provides the next step, using
> udelay(2) to define the *PIC specific* timing requirements, rather
> than on bus-oriented timing, which is not well calibrated.
thanks David, applied.
minor nit:
> + /* delay for some accesses to PIC on motherboard or in chipset must be
> + at least one microsecond, but be safe here. */
i changed this to the standard multi-line comment style of:
> + /*
> + * Delay for some accesses to PIC on motherboard or in chipset
> + * must be at least one microsecond, but be safe here:
> + */
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists