linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] cciss: procfs updates to display info about many volumes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 19 Feb 2008 11:48:18 +0100
From:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To:	Mike Miller <mike.miller@...com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] cciss: procfs updates to display info about many volumes

On Mon, Feb 11 2008, Mike Miller wrote:
> Patch 1 of 1
> 
> This patch allows us to display information about all of the logical volumes
> configured on a particular without stepping on memory even when there are
> many volumes (128 or more) configured. This patch replaces the one submitted
> on 20071214. See
> http://groups.google.com/group/linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/49a50244b19f8855/ba3dc95b23391521?hl=en&lnk=gst&q=cciss#ba3dc95b23391521
> which has not been merged. That patch displayed information about only the
> first logical volume on each controller and had negative side effects for some
> installers.
> Please consider this for inclusion.

It looks ok, but has some flaws. Try to disable cciss scsi and tape
support:

In file included from drivers/block/cciss.c:231:
drivers/block/cciss_scsi.c:1498:38: error: macro parameters must be
comma-separated
drivers/block/cciss.c: In function 'cciss_seq_show_header':
drivers/block/cciss.c:272: error: implicit declaration of function
'cciss_seq_tape_report'
drivers/block/cciss.c: In function 'cciss_proc_write':
drivers/block/cciss.c:393: error: implicit declaration of function
'cciss_engage_scsi'

You macro definition of cciss_seq_tape_report() is totally busted.
Either write is as a macro OR as a function.

Fix these up and resubmit, then I'll take it.

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/