[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47BAC9EA.1070305@anagramm.de>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 13:22:02 +0100
From: Clemens Koller <clemens.koller@...gramm.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: benh@...nel.crashing.org, linux-fbdev-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
adaplas@...il.com, Krzysztof Helt <krzysztof.h1@...zta.fm>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>,
valdis.kletnieks@...edu
Subject: Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] [PATCH 1/2] fb: add support for foreign endianness
Andrew Morton schrieb:
> On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 12:27:54 +0100 Clemens Koller <clemens.koller@...gramm.de> wrote:
>> Benjamin Herrenschmidt schrieb:
>>> On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 00:35 +0100, Clemens Koller wrote:
>>>> Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu schrieb:
>>>>> On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 08:18:47 +0100, Krzysztof Helt said:
>>>>>> I know two fb drivers which use endianess information (pm2fb and s3c2410fb).
>>>>>> Both resolve endianess at driver level. Actually, both handle it by setting special
>>>>>> bits so the graphics chip itself reorder bytes to transform foreign endianess.
>>>>>> I understand that this patch is for chips which cannot reorder bytes by themselves.
>>>>> Does anybody know of such a chip that's actually available in the wild? Or are
>>>>> we writing drivers for speculative possible chips?
>>>>>
>>>> I had troubles with the Silicon Motion SM501/SM502 endianess on PowerPC PCI vs. LocalBus.
>>>> The chip also has a register to swap endianess, but that seems to only affect some
>>>> LocalBus modes.
>>>> The current fb and X drivers are working, but when it comes to font
>>>> aliasing and hw-acceleration, the problems start to rise again...
>>> Most "sane" gfx chips nowadays provide configurable surfaces that allow
>>> to perform the swap when writing/reading from regions of the
>>> framebuffer, with the ability to set a different swapper setting (based
>>> on bit depth) per region.
>> Most! But not the SM50x. I still hope I would be wrong here. :-(
>>
>>> Then there is also the risk that your PCI<->Localbus has been wired
>>> improperly :-)
>> That's not an issue in my case. The SM50x can be connected to
>> either an PCI or some Local/CPU-whateverbus IF.
>> I.e. on the MPC85xx PowerPC, PCI and LocalBus are separate bussses.
>> If the sm501 is attached to the MPC85xx' PCI like any other video card,
>> the PCI config-space is can be accessed as usual, whereas the framebuffer
>> memory area is byte-swapped compared to other common video cards.
>>
>> So, to get back on topic:
>> I would welcome endianess swapping in SW. Some architectures (PowerPC)
>> should also be able to do swapped-endian mmapping. I just haven't
>> had time for a closer look but it looks also interesting way to do it
>> that way.
>
> Bizarrely, the original author of the patch (Anton) has fallen off the cc.
> Could whoever did that please thwap himself?
Propably my bad, being subscribed to several CCed lists...
> Anyway, my head is now officially spinning. Did anyone actually have a
> reason why we shouldn't proceed with Anton's patch?
Since it seem that there are some odd chips out in the wild, I guess
Valdis (also readded to CC:) has no more objections to give it a try. :-)
Regards,
Clemens
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists