linux-kernel - Re: [BUG] Linux 2.6.25-rc2 - Regression from 2.6.24-rc1-git1 softlockup while bootup on powerpc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 19 Feb 2008 18:49:24 +0530
From:	Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
CC:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] Linux 2.6.25-rc2 - Regression from 2.6.24-rc1-git1 softlockup
  while bootup on powerpc

Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19 2008, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
>> On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 20:29:13 +0100
>> Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com> wrote:
>>
>>> It's odd stuff. Could you perhaps try and add some printks to
>>> block/cfq-iosched.c:call_for_each_cic(), like dumping the 'nr' return
>>> from radix_tree_gang_lookup() and the pointer value of cics[i] in the
>>> for() loop after the lookup?
>>>
>> I met the same issue on ia64/NUMA box.
>> seems cisc[]->key is NULL and index for radix_tree_gang_lookup() was
>> always '1'.
> 
> Why does it keep repeating then? If ->key is NULL, the next lookup index
> should be 1UL.
> 
> But I think the radix 'scan over entire tree' is a bit fragile. This
> patch adds a parallel hlist for ease of properly browsing the members,
> does that work for you? It compiles, but I haven't booted it here yet...
> 
>> Attached patch works well for me, but I don't know much about cfq.
>> please confirm. 
> 
> It doesn't make a lot of sense, I'm afraid.
> 
>  block/blk-ioc.c           |   35 +++++++++++++++--------------------
>  block/cfq-iosched.c       |   37 +++++++++++--------------------------
>  include/linux/iocontext.h |    2 ++
>  3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/blk-ioc.c b/block/blk-ioc.c
> index 80245dc..73c7002 100644
> --- a/block/blk-ioc.c

<snip>

Hi Jens,

Thanks for the patch. The patch works fine, machine boots up without the kernel panic.


-- 
Thanks & Regards,
Kamalesh Babulal,
Linux Technology Center,
IBM, ISTL.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/