linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Tasklets: Avoid duplicating __tasklet_{,hi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080219155252.GA27280@elte.hu>
Date:	Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:52:52 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	"Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwish.07@...il.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Tasklets: Avoid duplicating __tasklet_{,hi_}schedule()
	code


* Ahmed S. Darwish <darwish.07@...il.com> wrote:

> -		local_irq_disable();
> -		t->next = __get_cpu_var(tasklet_vec).list;
> -		__get_cpu_var(tasklet_vec).list = t;
> -		__raise_softirq_irqoff(TASKLET_SOFTIRQ);
> -		local_irq_enable();
> +		/* We were not lucky enough to run, reschedule. */
> +		__tasklet_schedule(t);

i think there's a subtle difference that you missed: this one does 
__raise_softirq_irqoff(), while __tasklet_schedule() does a 
raise_softirq_irqoff(). (note the lack of undescores)

the reason is to avoid infinitely self-activating tasklets.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/