linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 00/11] possible debugfs/libfs consolidation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080219163810.GC3718@suse.de>
Date:	Tue, 19 Feb 2008 08:38:10 -0800
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 00/11] possible debugfs/libfs consolidation

On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 05:04:35AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> I noticed that there is a lot of duplication in pseudo
> file systems, so I started looking into how to consolidate
> them. I ended up with a largish rework of the structure
> of libfs and moving almost all of debugfs in there as well.
> 
> As an example, I also have patches that reduce debugfs,
> securityfs and usbfs to the point where they are mostly
> thin wrappers around libfs, with large comment blocks.
> Other file systems could be changed in the same way, but
> I first like to see if people agree that I'm on the right
> track.

I like the idea, and have no objection to these patches at all.  Please
feel free to test them and send them again :)

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/