[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47BB12FA.5050604@ct.jp.nec.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:33:46 -0800
From: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@...jp.nec.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] latencytop: fix kernel panic and memory leak on proc
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:51:19 -0800
>> Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@...jp.nec.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I posted 2 patches to fix kernel panic and memory leak.
>>> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/14/282
>>> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/14/283
>>>
>>> But, I think this patch is better than old ones.
>
> thanks Hiroshi, applied.
Hi Ingo,
I'd like to be applied new patch for latencytop fix.
I think it better than old ptaches.
Can you apply this patch for latencytop issues?
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/14/451
It's replacement of old patches you applied.
It makes latency file behavior same as other proc files.
get_proc_task() and put_task_struct() are called at read time,
and returns -ESRCH if get_proc_task() failed.
If is there any problem, please let me know.
thanks,
Hiroshi Shimamoto
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists