linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/8] AMD opteron mm config numa etc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080219175339.GB8344@kroah.com>
Date:	Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:53:39 -0800
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Yinghai Lu <Yinghai.Lu@....COM>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] AMD opteron mm config numa etc

On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 12:23:22PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Yinghai Lu <Yinghai.Lu@....COM> wrote:
> 
> > please check some amd opteron related mmconf and numa patches
> > 
> > could make up for system that system have acpi problem or still can 
> > mmconf and numa when acpi=off
> 
> Greg, any deep objections against these patches? (other than that they 
> need a good amount of testing) I personally think that the more 
> independent the kernel is of the whims of the BIOS, the better ...

No objection from me, other than they need a LOT of testing.  Oh, and
the networking patch is still wrong, and the poster has been told this
numerous times, which makes me wonder how well the pci bridge patch was
tested...

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/