linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.25-rc2-mm1 (x64 thermal build failure)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <47BB52B9.5020702@oracle.com>
Date:	Tue, 19 Feb 2008 14:05:45 -0800
From:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To:	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>
CC:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, len.brown@...el.com,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, michael@...e-electrons.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc2-mm1 (x64 thermal build failure)

Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Le Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:41:47 -0800,
> Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> a écrit :
> 
>> Does this patch apply to -mm?  Seem like No.
> 
> No, it was generated against 2.6.25-rc2.
> 
>> After converting it from mime(?) to ASCII
> 
> Probably due to my PGP-MIME signature. Will try to remember that
> I should disable it next time.
> 
>> and fixing one #if (change "and" to "&&")
> 
> Oops. Fixed on my side too.
> 
>> & fixing patch rejects, it does build cleanly.
> 
> The rejects are probably due to the patch being applied to -mm. It
> applies fine on -rc here.
> 
> Any opinion about whether the patch is clean ? Worth it ?

It seems reasonable to me as long as the option depends on EMBEDDED,
as it does.

-- 
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/