| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <47BB54C2.6090501@cybernetics.com> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 17:14:26 -0500 From: Tony Battersby <tonyb@...ernetics.com> To: Michael Chan <mchan@...adcom.com> Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, gregkh@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: TG3 network data corruption regression 2.6.24/2.6.23.4 Michael Chan wrote: > On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 11:16 -0500, Tony Battersby wrote: > >> iSCSI >> performance drops to 6 - 15 MB/s when the 3Com NIC is doing heavy rx >> with light tx, >> > > That's strange. The patch should only affect TX performance slightly > since we are just turning off SG for TX. Please take an ethereal trace > to see what's happening and compare with a good trace. > > Update: when I revert Herbert's patch in addition to applying your patch, the iSCSI performance goes back up to 115 MB/s again in both directions. So it looks like turning off SG for TX didn't itself cause the performance drop, but rather that the performance drop is just another manifestation of whatever bug is causing the data corruption. I do not regularly use wireshark or look at network packet dumps, so I am not really sure what to look for. Given the above information, do you still believe that there is value in examining the packet dump? Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists