[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080219222828.GB28786@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 23:28:28 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
marcelo@...ck.org, daniel.spang@...il.com, riel@...hat.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, a1426z@...ab.com,
jonathan@...masters.org, zlynx@....org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8][for -mm] mem_notify v6
On Tue 2008-02-19 09:00:08, Paul Jackson wrote:
> Kosaki-san wrote:
> > Thank you for wonderful interestings comment.
>
> You're most welcome. The pleasure is all mine.
>
> > you think kill the process just after swap, right?
> > but unfortunately, almost user hope receive notification before swap ;-)
> > because avoid swap.
>
> There is not much my customers HPC jobs can do with notification before
> swap. Their jobs either have the main memory they need to perform the
> requested calculations with the desired performance, or their job is
> useless and should be killed. Unlike the applications you describe,
> my customers jobs have no way, once running, to adapt to less
> memory.
Sounds like a job for memory limits (ulimit?), not for OOM
notification, right?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists