[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200802192349.33347.elendil@planet.nl>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 23:49:32 +0100
From: Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25
On Tuesday 19 February 2008, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> The "or any other emulator" is exactly where my question is directed at.
>
> Xen, KVM or even qemu come into my mind, but considering how loudly you
> complained about a temporary breakage for VirtualBox there must be a
> reason why your work on the Debian Installer can only be done
> effectively and efficiently with an emulator module that has AFAIK not
> been submitted for inclusion in the kernel.
- Xen is currently not supported by the kernel Debian Installer uses (though
work is being done to change that.
- KVM AFAIK requires hardware support that I don't have.
- QEMU is completely useless because of its slow speed without the (also out
of tree) kqemu module, which does not work when the host system is x86_64
[1]. Also, I very much prefer the VirtualBox user interface over what qemu
has to offer.
- I've actually used VMWare for a long time (licenced), but stopped after
the 5 series stopped working with current kernels and around that time
VirtualBox became available as an alternative.
Hope that explains.
Cheers,
FJP
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/444160
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists