[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080220064321.GB29587@lazybastard.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 07:43:22 +0100
From: Jörn Engel <joern@...fs.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Jörn Engel <joern@...fs.org>,
Stephane Chazelas <stephane.chazelas@...rson.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.24] block2mtd: removing a device and typo fixes
On Tue, 19 February 2008 23:33:38 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> Given that loop works in this way, I certainly see that as doable,
> but then I'd vote for using the existing ioctl semantics of
> LOOP_SET_FD and LOOP_DEL_FD on the mtdchar device, which already
> comes with an ioctl interface for mtd devices.
> I'd probably also allow the LOOP_{GET,SET}_STATUS{,64} commands,
> so you can actually use the existing losetup tool.
> That way, we wouldn't have to introduce a new API, just extend
> an existing one to work on more things.
I like this approach. It somewhat collides with the mtd principle of
having a seperate module for every 2-3 lines of code, but maybe that is
not a bad thing after all.
Onto my list of code to write on rainy afternoons (and secretly hoping
for others to do it instead).
Jörn
--
Mundie uses a textbook tactic of manipulation: start with some
reasonable talk, and lead the audience to an unreasonable conclusion.
-- Bruce Perens
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists