[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.00.0802200751010.7583@apollo.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 07:51:43 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@...ts.osdl.org>,
jbohac@...e.cz, kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
jikos@...e.cz, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Subject: Re: tsc breaks atkbd suspend
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008, Len Brown wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 February 2008 11:51, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Tue, 19 Feb 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > * Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> wrote:
> > >
> > > > TSC is used even on machines when CONFIG_X86_TSC is not set (X86_TSC
> > > > means _require_ TSC), but it is not properly disabled when it is
> > > > unusable, because acpi code understood the config switch as "may use
> > > > TSC".
> > > >
> > > > This actually fixes suspend problems on my x60.
> > >
> > > ah! This makes tons of sense. I've applied your patch
>
> please do not.
It's not in the -mm branch.
> > > - but i guess it should go via the ACPI tree.
>
> yes.
>
> > Right. The breakage was introduced there when IA64 switched to
> > GENERIC_TIME and the X86_TSC dependency was added.
>
> so do we need a patch for 2.6.23.stable and 2.6.24.stable?
Yes.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists