linux-kernel - Re: SMP-related kernel memory leak

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e2e108260802192327v124a841dnc7d9b1c7e9057545@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 20 Feb 2008 08:27:48 +0100
From:	"Bart Van Assche" <bart.vanassche@...il.com>
To:	"Oliver Pinter" <oliver.pntr@...il.com>
Cc:	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: SMP-related kernel memory leak

On Feb 19, 2008 7:18 PM, Oliver Pinter <oliver.pntr@...il.com> wrote:
> On 2/19/08, Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...il.com> wrote:
> > I noticed that the amount of memory used by the Linux kernel steadily
> > increases over time on SMP systems (x86 architecture, 32-bit kernel).
> > This problem disappears when I add maxcpus=1 to the kernel command
> > line. I have observed this behavior both on the 2.6.22.18 and 2.6.24.2
> > kernels. Did anyone notice anything similar ?
> >
> > See also: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9991
>
> this patch fixed them http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/18/405 ?

Thanks for the hint. If I interpreted the 2.6.24 changelog correctly
this patch is already included with 2.6.24 ? The problem still occurs
with 2.6.24.2. I am currently trying to find the minimal kernel config
which still triggers this problem. Any other hints for finding the
cause of this issue are welcome of course.

Bart Van Assche.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/