[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86802c440802200033h35bf670y111c75998434f019@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 00:33:59 -0800
From: "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
To: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: "David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, greg@...ah.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, jeff@...zik.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] net: use numa_node in net_devcice->dev instead of parent
On Feb 19, 2008 10:27 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
> * Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > > > can you check the 5/8? that will make sure every struct device get
> > > > numa_node get assigned.
> > >
> > > Why do we need to bother with that if the parent will have the
> > > necessary information for us here?
> >
> > less code?
> >
> > or some kind of usb or other bus interface. may have several level...
>
> you mean it's a small optimization: otherwise every struct device (net
> dev, usb...) need to go back to find another pci device (parent or host
> controller) to use their numa_node.
>
Yes.
YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists