| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 11:38:31 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Yinghai Lu <Yinghai.Lu@....COM>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] AMD opteron mm config numa etc * Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote: > On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 07:37:52 +0100 Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote: > > > Note: Andrew might get grumpy when > > your PCI tree starts changing nearby places in arch/x86/pci again and it > > clashes with these changes in x86.git > > s/Andrew/Stephen/I hope/;)/ > > Hopefully we can soon start feeding these more problematic trees into > linux-next and yes, Stephen will need some more thought/support from > his upstreams to make that viable. btw., the correct metric would be "real user-side regressions per commit" (maybe real regressions per line of code changed), not "number of commits". With the latter metric, x86.git is "problematic". For the former, it's much less so ;-) i.e. you should punish buggy trees that affect real testers out there, not high-flux trees that by virtue of their flux cause more integration work. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists