[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080220103831.GH3881@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 11:38:31 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Yinghai Lu <Yinghai.Lu@....COM>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] AMD opteron mm config numa etc
* Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 07:37:52 +0100 Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
> > Note: Andrew might get grumpy when
> > your PCI tree starts changing nearby places in arch/x86/pci again and it
> > clashes with these changes in x86.git
>
> s/Andrew/Stephen/I hope/;)/
>
> Hopefully we can soon start feeding these more problematic trees into
> linux-next and yes, Stephen will need some more thought/support from
> his upstreams to make that viable.
btw., the correct metric would be "real user-side regressions per
commit" (maybe real regressions per line of code changed), not "number
of commits". With the latter metric, x86.git is "problematic". For the
former, it's much less so ;-)
i.e. you should punish buggy trees that affect real testers out there,
not high-flux trees that by virtue of their flux cause more integration
work.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists