linux-kernel - Re: Improve init/Kconfig help descriptions [PATCH 6/9]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 20 Feb 2008 23:41:55 +1100
From:	Nick Andrew <nick@...k-andrew.net>
To:	Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
Cc:	Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Improve init/Kconfig help descriptions [PATCH 6/9]

On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 09:39:58AM -0600, Paul Jackson wrote:
> I don't think /proc/<pid>/cpuset (PROC_PID_CPUSET) is, or should be,
> deprecated.

Ok, I had just picked up on the "legacy" word in the option title
and assumed that it meant deprecated.

This is what I've got now:

 config PROC_PID_CPUSET
        bool "Include legacy /proc/<pid>/cpuset file"
        depends on CPUSETS
        default y
+       help
+         This option provides the /proc/<pid>/cpuset file.
+
+         This file contains the name of the cpuset in which
+         the process is executing. For more information, see
+         <file:Documentation/cpusets.txt>
+
+         If unsure, say Y.

In general, are option titles fragile? For example, if I were to submit
a patch which changes an option's title string, is this likely to break
something or somebody?

Nick.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/