[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47BC2AB7.4040402@southpole.se>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:27:19 +0100
From: Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
greg@...ah.com
Subject: Re: pci_device_id cleanups
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 01:53:36PM +0100, Jonas Bonn wrote:
>> The PCI_DEVICE_TABLE patch I sent earlier doesn't necessarily make
>> much sense by itself... here is a set of patches that apply
>> this macro, in turn moving a lot of this data into __devinitconst
>> which is discardable in certain situations.
>> Hopefully the benefit of this approach is a bit clearer now.
> [shorter lines please..]
Sorry...
>
> Can you please confirm that this does not break powerpc (64 bit)
> as they have troubles with the constification..
I do not have access to any PowerPC machine... Olof Johansson built the
tree I posted earlier on PowerPC; there's nothing really new here except
the wrapping of the definition in a macro.
But of course, it would great if someone could confirm this...
>
> Sam
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists