[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47BC3332.7090705@southpole.se>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 15:03:30 +0100
From: Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
greg@...ah.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: PowerPC toolchain for x86 [Was: pci_device_id cleanups]
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 02:27:19PM +0100, Jonas Bonn wrote:
>> Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 01:53:36PM +0100, Jonas Bonn wrote:
>>>> The PCI_DEVICE_TABLE patch I sent earlier doesn't necessarily make
>>>> much sense by itself... here is a set of patches that apply
>>>> this macro, in turn moving a lot of this data into __devinitconst
>>>> which is discardable in certain situations.
>>>> Hopefully the benefit of this approach is a bit clearer now.
>>> [shorter lines please..]
>> Sorry...
>>
>>> Can you please confirm that this does not break powerpc (64 bit)
>>> as they have troubles with the constification..
>> I do not have access to any PowerPC machine... Olof Johansson built the
>> tree I posted earlier on PowerPC; there's nothing really new here except
>> the wrapping of the definition in a macro.
> And you added const and a specific section.
No... once the macro is expanded the code is exactly the same as that
which built cleanly on powerpc previously (which Olof, built, I mean)...
nothing new here.
> Exactly what could break on PowerPC.
>
> To do the build break check is easy.
> Google for "crosstool" and build your own powerpc toolchain.
>
Thanks... I'll throw together a cross compiler and see what I can do.
/Jonas
> Andrew has something precompiled somewhere but I lost the link.
>
>
> Sam
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists