[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080220003951.GA4844@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:39:51 -0800
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
Cc: Andreas Jaeger <aj@...e.de>, muli@...ibm.com, discuss@...-64.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
jdmason@...zu.us, linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [discuss] pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 01:11:42PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On Thursday 14 February 2008, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> > Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> writes:
> >
> > > How does the patch below look? I didn't want to remove the whole config
> > > option, as there is more to the logic than just the "reverse order"
> > > stuff there.
> >
> > I think you miss Documentation - it's mentioned in ide.txt and
> > kernel-parameters.txt,
>
> + drivers/ide/Kconfig
>
> Greg, please update the patch (and add my S-o-B while at it).
Now done, thanks.
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists