[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080220161941.6e9a2e16@core>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 16:19:41 +0000
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, roland@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: tty && pid problems
> > *ping* - Any further activity on this one? I got bit by it as well on
> > the very first attempted boot of 25-rc2-mm1, the instant it tried to leave
> > single-user and go multi-user.
>
> Valdis, any chance you can try the
> "[PATCH] (for -mm only) put_pid: make sure we don't free the live pid"
> I sent? just to make sure we don't have other problems here.
There is some other iffy locking of the pid objects ever since they were
changed from pid_t to ref counted structs. Whoever did that didn't add
any locking for it, and the old code knew it was "safe" not to.
I've added locks in my test tree and now I've finally got -mm to build
will do some testing then push more stuff upstream
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists