linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/5] signal(x86_32): Improve the signal stack overflow check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <47BB83E2.1030504@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Wed, 20 Feb 2008 09:35:30 +0800
From:	Shi Weihua <shiwh@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] signal(x86_32): Improve the signal stack overflow
 check

Roland McGrath wrote::
>>> Please elaborate on the rationale that justifies this change.
>>> I don't see it at all.
>> I have corrected the comment in the latest patch which has been apllied by Ingo.
>> Please refer to http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/18/575 and http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/19/119 .
> 
> You have yet to say anything to justify your change.

You mean the comment?

I mean I made a mistake about the comment so I changed it, and then
Valdis.Kletnieks pointed it out for me. And late I sent a revised
patch with your original comment untouched.

Sorry for my poor English.  :( 

Thanks
Shi Weihua

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/