linux-kernel - Re: [Bug 10030] Suspend doesn't work when SD card is inserted

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 20 Feb 2008 16:06:14 -0500 (EST)
From:	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To:	Pierre Ossman <drzeus-mmc@...eus.cx>
cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@...il.com>,
	Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Bug 10030] Suspend doesn't work when SD card is inserted

On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Pierre Ossman wrote:

> > And why not simply fail the suspend if the resume routine doesn't exist
> > and the suspend routine does?  Maybe with an error message in the
> > system log.
> 
> For the asymmetric case, I guess that would do. But I still want to remove devices when the bus handler has no suspend handling.

Then it appears the correct approach is to use the new 
device_pm_schedule_removal() routine.  It schedules the removal of a 
suspended device for a time when the system suspend is over.

Alan Stern

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/