[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080221152641.4804.61380.stgit@novell1.haskins.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 10:26:41 -0500
From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>
To: mingo@...e.hu, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, tglx@...utronix.de,
rostedt@...dmis.org, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bill.huey@...il.com,
kevin@...man.org, cminyard@...sta.com, dsingleton@...sta.com,
dwalker@...sta.com, npiggin@...e.de, dsaxena@...xity.net,
ak@...e.de, gregkh@...e.de, sdietrich@...ell.com,
pmorreale@...ell.com, mkohari@...ell.com, ghaskins@...ell.com
Subject: [PATCH [RT] 03/14] x86: FIFO ticket spinlocks
From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
Introduce ticket lock spinlocks for x86 which are FIFO. The implementation
is described in the comments. The straight-line lock/unlock instruction
sequence is slightly slower than the dec based locks on modern x86 CPUs,
however the difference is quite small on Core2 and Opteron when working out of
cache, and becomes almost insignificant even on P4 when the lock misses cache.
trylock is more significantly slower, but they are relatively rare.
On an 8 core (2 socket) Opteron, spinlock unfairness is extremely noticable,
with a userspace test having a difference of up to 2x runtime per thread, and
some threads are starved or "unfairly" granted the lock up to 1 000 000 (!)
times. After this patch, all threads appear to finish at exactly the same
time.
The memory ordering of the lock does conform to x86 standards, and the
implementation has been reviewed by Intel and AMD engineers.
The algorithm also tells us how many CPUs are contending the lock, so
lockbreak becomes trivial and we no longer have to waste 4 bytes per
spinlock for it.
After this, we can no longer spin on any locks with preempt enabled
and cannot reenable interrupts when spinning on an irq safe lock, because
at that point we have already taken a ticket and the would deadlock if
the same CPU tries to take the lock again. These are questionable anyway:
if the lock happens to be called under a preempt or interrupt disabled section,
then it will just have the same latency problems. The real fix is to keep
critical sections short, and ensure locks are reasonably fair (which this
patch does).
Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
---
include/asm-x86/spinlock.h | 225 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/asm-x86/spinlock_32.h | 221 -------------------------------------
include/asm-x86/spinlock_64.h | 167 ----------------------------
include/asm-x86/spinlock_types.h | 2
4 files changed, 224 insertions(+), 391 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/asm-x86/spinlock.h b/include/asm-x86/spinlock.h
index d74d85e..72fe445 100644
--- a/include/asm-x86/spinlock.h
+++ b/include/asm-x86/spinlock.h
@@ -1,5 +1,226 @@
+#ifndef _X86_SPINLOCK_H_
+#define _X86_SPINLOCK_H_
+
+#include <asm/atomic.h>
+#include <asm/rwlock.h>
+#include <asm/page.h>
+#include <asm/processor.h>
+#include <linux/compiler.h>
+
+/*
+ * Your basic SMP spinlocks, allowing only a single CPU anywhere
+ *
+ * Simple spin lock operations. There are two variants, one clears IRQ's
+ * on the local processor, one does not.
+ *
+ * These are fair FIFO ticket locks, which are currently limited to 256
+ * CPUs.
+ *
+ * (the type definitions are in asm/spinlock_types.h)
+ */
+
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
-# include "spinlock_32.h"
+typedef char _slock_t;
+# define LOCK_INS_DEC "decb"
+# define LOCK_INS_XCH "xchgb"
+# define LOCK_INS_MOV "movb"
+# define LOCK_INS_CMP "cmpb"
+# define LOCK_PTR_REG "a"
#else
-# include "spinlock_64.h"
+typedef int _slock_t;
+# define LOCK_INS_DEC "decl"
+# define LOCK_INS_XCH "xchgl"
+# define LOCK_INS_MOV "movl"
+# define LOCK_INS_CMP "cmpl"
+# define LOCK_PTR_REG "D"
+#endif
+
+#if (NR_CPUS > 256)
+#error spinlock supports a maximum of 256 CPUs
+#endif
+
+static inline int __raw_spin_is_locked(__raw_spinlock_t *lock)
+{
+ int tmp = *(volatile signed int *)(&(lock)->slock);
+
+ return (((tmp >> 8) & 0xff) != (tmp & 0xff));
+}
+
+static inline int __raw_spin_is_contended(__raw_spinlock_t *lock)
+{
+ int tmp = *(volatile signed int *)(&(lock)->slock);
+
+ return (((tmp >> 8) & 0xff) - (tmp & 0xff)) > 1;
+}
+
+static inline void __raw_spin_lock(__raw_spinlock_t *lock)
+{
+ short inc = 0x0100;
+
+ /*
+ * Ticket locks are conceptually two bytes, one indicating the current
+ * head of the queue, and the other indicating the current tail. The
+ * lock is acquired by atomically noting the tail and incrementing it
+ * by one (thus adding ourself to the queue and noting our position),
+ * then waiting until the head becomes equal to the the initial value
+ * of the tail.
+ *
+ * This uses a 16-bit xadd to increment the tail and also load the
+ * position of the head, which takes care of memory ordering issues
+ * and should be optimal for the uncontended case. Note the tail must
+ * be in the high byte, otherwise the 16-bit wide increment of the low
+ * byte would carry up and contaminate the high byte.
+ */
+
+ __asm__ __volatile__ (
+ LOCK_PREFIX "xaddw %w0, %1\n"
+ "1:\t"
+ "cmpb %h0, %b0\n\t"
+ "je 2f\n\t"
+ "rep ; nop\n\t"
+ "movb %1, %b0\n\t"
+ /* don't need lfence here, because loads are in-order */
+ "jmp 1b\n"
+ "2:"
+ :"+Q" (inc), "+m" (lock->slock)
+ :
+ :"memory", "cc");
+}
+
+#define __raw_spin_lock_flags(lock, flags) __raw_spin_lock(lock)
+
+static inline int __raw_spin_trylock(__raw_spinlock_t *lock)
+{
+ int tmp;
+ short new;
+
+ asm volatile(
+ "movw %2,%w0\n\t"
+ "cmpb %h0,%b0\n\t"
+ "jne 1f\n\t"
+ "movw %w0,%w1\n\t"
+ "incb %h1\n\t"
+ "lock ; cmpxchgw %w1,%2\n\t"
+ "1:"
+ "sete %b1\n\t"
+ "movzbl %b1,%0\n\t"
+ :"=&a" (tmp), "=Q" (new), "+m" (lock->slock)
+ :
+ : "memory", "cc");
+
+ return tmp;
+}
+
+#if defined(CONFIG_X86_32) && \
+ (defined(CONFIG_X86_OOSTORE) || defined(CONFIG_X86_PPRO_FENCE))
+/*
+ * On PPro SMP or if we are using OOSTORE, we use a locked operation to unlock
+ * (PPro errata 66, 92)
+ */
+# define UNLOCK_LOCK_PREFIX LOCK_PREFIX
+#else
+# define UNLOCK_LOCK_PREFIX
+#endif
+
+static inline void __raw_spin_unlock(__raw_spinlock_t *lock)
+{
+ __asm__ __volatile__(
+ UNLOCK_LOCK_PREFIX "incb %0"
+ :"+m" (lock->slock)
+ :
+ :"memory", "cc");
+}
+
+static inline void __raw_spin_unlock_wait(__raw_spinlock_t *lock)
+{
+ while (__raw_spin_is_locked(lock))
+ cpu_relax();
+}
+
+/*
+ * Read-write spinlocks, allowing multiple readers
+ * but only one writer.
+ *
+ * NOTE! it is quite common to have readers in interrupts
+ * but no interrupt writers. For those circumstances we
+ * can "mix" irq-safe locks - any writer needs to get a
+ * irq-safe write-lock, but readers can get non-irqsafe
+ * read-locks.
+ *
+ * On x86, we implement read-write locks as a 32-bit counter
+ * with the high bit (sign) being the "contended" bit.
+ */
+
+/**
+ * read_can_lock - would read_trylock() succeed?
+ * @lock: the rwlock in question.
+ */
+static inline int __raw_read_can_lock(__raw_rwlock_t *lock)
+{
+ return (int)(lock)->lock > 0;
+}
+
+/**
+ * write_can_lock - would write_trylock() succeed?
+ * @lock: the rwlock in question.
+ */
+static inline int __raw_write_can_lock(__raw_rwlock_t *lock)
+{
+ return (lock)->lock == RW_LOCK_BIAS;
+}
+
+static inline void __raw_read_lock(__raw_rwlock_t *rw)
+{
+ asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX " subl $1,(%0)\n\t"
+ "jns 1f\n"
+ "call __read_lock_failed\n\t"
+ "1:\n"
+ ::LOCK_PTR_REG (rw) : "memory");
+}
+
+static inline void __raw_write_lock(__raw_rwlock_t *rw)
+{
+ asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX " subl %1,(%0)\n\t"
+ "jz 1f\n"
+ "call __write_lock_failed\n\t"
+ "1:\n"
+ ::LOCK_PTR_REG (rw), "i" (RW_LOCK_BIAS) : "memory");
+}
+
+static inline int __raw_read_trylock(__raw_rwlock_t *lock)
+{
+ atomic_t *count = (atomic_t *)lock;
+
+ atomic_dec(count);
+ if (atomic_read(count) >= 0)
+ return 1;
+ atomic_inc(count);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static inline int __raw_write_trylock(__raw_rwlock_t *lock)
+{
+ atomic_t *count = (atomic_t *)lock;
+
+ if (atomic_sub_and_test(RW_LOCK_BIAS, count))
+ return 1;
+ atomic_add(RW_LOCK_BIAS, count);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static inline void __raw_read_unlock(__raw_rwlock_t *rw)
+{
+ asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "incl %0" :"+m" (rw->lock) : : "memory");
+}
+
+static inline void __raw_write_unlock(__raw_rwlock_t *rw)
+{
+ asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "addl %1, %0"
+ : "+m" (rw->lock) : "i" (RW_LOCK_BIAS) : "memory");
+}
+
+#define _raw_spin_relax(lock) cpu_relax()
+#define _raw_read_relax(lock) cpu_relax()
+#define _raw_write_relax(lock) cpu_relax()
+
#endif
diff --git a/include/asm-x86/spinlock_32.h b/include/asm-x86/spinlock_32.h
deleted file mode 100644
index 0c6de90..0000000
--- a/include/asm-x86/spinlock_32.h
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,221 +0,0 @@
-#ifndef __ASM_SPINLOCK_H
-#define __ASM_SPINLOCK_H
-
-#include <asm/atomic.h>
-#include <asm/rwlock.h>
-#include <asm/page.h>
-#include <asm/processor.h>
-#include <linux/compiler.h>
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT
-#include <asm/paravirt.h>
-#else
-#define CLI_STRING "cli"
-#define STI_STRING "sti"
-#define CLI_STI_CLOBBERS
-#define CLI_STI_INPUT_ARGS
-#endif /* CONFIG_PARAVIRT */
-
-/*
- * Your basic SMP spinlocks, allowing only a single CPU anywhere
- *
- * Simple spin lock operations. There are two variants, one clears IRQ's
- * on the local processor, one does not.
- *
- * We make no fairness assumptions. They have a cost.
- *
- * (the type definitions are in asm/spinlock_types.h)
- */
-
-static inline int __raw_spin_is_locked(__raw_spinlock_t *x)
-{
- return *(volatile signed char *)(&(x)->slock) <= 0;
-}
-
-static inline void __raw_spin_lock(__raw_spinlock_t *lock)
-{
- asm volatile("\n1:\t"
- LOCK_PREFIX " ; decb %0\n\t"
- "jns 3f\n"
- "2:\t"
- "rep;nop\n\t"
- "cmpb $0,%0\n\t"
- "jle 2b\n\t"
- "jmp 1b\n"
- "3:\n\t"
- : "+m" (lock->slock) : : "memory");
-}
-
-/*
- * It is easier for the lock validator if interrupts are not re-enabled
- * in the middle of a lock-acquire. This is a performance feature anyway
- * so we turn it off:
- *
- * NOTE: there's an irqs-on section here, which normally would have to be
- * irq-traced, but on CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS we never use this variant.
- */
-#ifndef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
-static inline void __raw_spin_lock_flags(__raw_spinlock_t *lock, unsigned long flags)
-{
- asm volatile(
- "\n1:\t"
- LOCK_PREFIX " ; decb %[slock]\n\t"
- "jns 5f\n"
- "2:\t"
- "testl $0x200, %[flags]\n\t"
- "jz 4f\n\t"
- STI_STRING "\n"
- "3:\t"
- "rep;nop\n\t"
- "cmpb $0, %[slock]\n\t"
- "jle 3b\n\t"
- CLI_STRING "\n\t"
- "jmp 1b\n"
- "4:\t"
- "rep;nop\n\t"
- "cmpb $0, %[slock]\n\t"
- "jg 1b\n\t"
- "jmp 4b\n"
- "5:\n\t"
- : [slock] "+m" (lock->slock)
- : [flags] "r" (flags)
- CLI_STI_INPUT_ARGS
- : "memory" CLI_STI_CLOBBERS);
-}
-#endif
-
-static inline int __raw_spin_trylock(__raw_spinlock_t *lock)
-{
- char oldval;
- asm volatile(
- "xchgb %b0,%1"
- :"=q" (oldval), "+m" (lock->slock)
- :"0" (0) : "memory");
- return oldval > 0;
-}
-
-/*
- * __raw_spin_unlock based on writing $1 to the low byte.
- * This method works. Despite all the confusion.
- * (except on PPro SMP or if we are using OOSTORE, so we use xchgb there)
- * (PPro errata 66, 92)
- */
-
-#if !defined(CONFIG_X86_OOSTORE) && !defined(CONFIG_X86_PPRO_FENCE)
-
-static inline void __raw_spin_unlock(__raw_spinlock_t *lock)
-{
- asm volatile("movb $1,%0" : "+m" (lock->slock) :: "memory");
-}
-
-#else
-
-static inline void __raw_spin_unlock(__raw_spinlock_t *lock)
-{
- char oldval = 1;
-
- asm volatile("xchgb %b0, %1"
- : "=q" (oldval), "+m" (lock->slock)
- : "0" (oldval) : "memory");
-}
-
-#endif
-
-static inline void __raw_spin_unlock_wait(__raw_spinlock_t *lock)
-{
- while (__raw_spin_is_locked(lock))
- cpu_relax();
-}
-
-/*
- * Read-write spinlocks, allowing multiple readers
- * but only one writer.
- *
- * NOTE! it is quite common to have readers in interrupts
- * but no interrupt writers. For those circumstances we
- * can "mix" irq-safe locks - any writer needs to get a
- * irq-safe write-lock, but readers can get non-irqsafe
- * read-locks.
- *
- * On x86, we implement read-write locks as a 32-bit counter
- * with the high bit (sign) being the "contended" bit.
- *
- * The inline assembly is non-obvious. Think about it.
- *
- * Changed to use the same technique as rw semaphores. See
- * semaphore.h for details. -ben
- *
- * the helpers are in arch/i386/kernel/semaphore.c
- */
-
-/**
- * read_can_lock - would read_trylock() succeed?
- * @lock: the rwlock in question.
- */
-static inline int __raw_read_can_lock(__raw_rwlock_t *x)
-{
- return (int)(x)->lock > 0;
-}
-
-/**
- * write_can_lock - would write_trylock() succeed?
- * @lock: the rwlock in question.
- */
-static inline int __raw_write_can_lock(__raw_rwlock_t *x)
-{
- return (x)->lock == RW_LOCK_BIAS;
-}
-
-static inline void __raw_read_lock(__raw_rwlock_t *rw)
-{
- asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX " subl $1,(%0)\n\t"
- "jns 1f\n"
- "call __read_lock_failed\n\t"
- "1:\n"
- ::"a" (rw) : "memory");
-}
-
-static inline void __raw_write_lock(__raw_rwlock_t *rw)
-{
- asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX " subl $" RW_LOCK_BIAS_STR ",(%0)\n\t"
- "jz 1f\n"
- "call __write_lock_failed\n\t"
- "1:\n"
- ::"a" (rw) : "memory");
-}
-
-static inline int __raw_read_trylock(__raw_rwlock_t *lock)
-{
- atomic_t *count = (atomic_t *)lock;
- atomic_dec(count);
- if (atomic_read(count) >= 0)
- return 1;
- atomic_inc(count);
- return 0;
-}
-
-static inline int __raw_write_trylock(__raw_rwlock_t *lock)
-{
- atomic_t *count = (atomic_t *)lock;
- if (atomic_sub_and_test(RW_LOCK_BIAS, count))
- return 1;
- atomic_add(RW_LOCK_BIAS, count);
- return 0;
-}
-
-static inline void __raw_read_unlock(__raw_rwlock_t *rw)
-{
- asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "incl %0" :"+m" (rw->lock) : : "memory");
-}
-
-static inline void __raw_write_unlock(__raw_rwlock_t *rw)
-{
- asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "addl $" RW_LOCK_BIAS_STR ", %0"
- : "+m" (rw->lock) : : "memory");
-}
-
-#define __raw_spin_relax(lock) cpu_relax()
-#define __raw_read_relax(lock) cpu_relax()
-#define __raw_write_relax(lock) cpu_relax()
-
-#endif /* __ASM_SPINLOCK_H */
diff --git a/include/asm-x86/spinlock_64.h b/include/asm-x86/spinlock_64.h
deleted file mode 100644
index 8b76dc0..0000000
--- a/include/asm-x86/spinlock_64.h
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,167 +0,0 @@
-#ifndef __ASM_SPINLOCK_H
-#define __ASM_SPINLOCK_H
-
-#include <asm/atomic.h>
-#include <asm/rwlock.h>
-#include <asm/page.h>
-#include <asm/processor.h>
-
-/*
- * Your basic SMP spinlocks, allowing only a single CPU anywhere
- *
- * Simple spin lock operations. There are two variants, one clears IRQ's
- * on the local processor, one does not.
- *
- * We make no fairness assumptions. They have a cost.
- *
- * (the type definitions are in asm/spinlock_types.h)
- */
-
-static inline int __raw_spin_is_locked(__raw_spinlock_t *lock)
-{
- return *(volatile signed int *)(&(lock)->slock) <= 0;
-}
-
-static inline void __raw_spin_lock(__raw_spinlock_t *lock)
-{
- asm volatile(
- "\n1:\t"
- LOCK_PREFIX " ; decl %0\n\t"
- "jns 2f\n"
- "3:\n"
- "rep;nop\n\t"
- "cmpl $0,%0\n\t"
- "jle 3b\n\t"
- "jmp 1b\n"
- "2:\t" : "=m" (lock->slock) : : "memory");
-}
-
-/*
- * Same as __raw_spin_lock, but reenable interrupts during spinning.
- */
-#ifndef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
-static inline void __raw_spin_lock_flags(__raw_spinlock_t *lock, unsigned long flags)
-{
- asm volatile(
- "\n1:\t"
- LOCK_PREFIX " ; decl %0\n\t"
- "jns 5f\n"
- "testl $0x200, %1\n\t" /* interrupts were disabled? */
- "jz 4f\n\t"
- "sti\n"
- "3:\t"
- "rep;nop\n\t"
- "cmpl $0, %0\n\t"
- "jle 3b\n\t"
- "cli\n\t"
- "jmp 1b\n"
- "4:\t"
- "rep;nop\n\t"
- "cmpl $0, %0\n\t"
- "jg 1b\n\t"
- "jmp 4b\n"
- "5:\n\t"
- : "+m" (lock->slock) : "r" ((unsigned)flags) : "memory");
-}
-#endif
-
-static inline int __raw_spin_trylock(__raw_spinlock_t *lock)
-{
- int oldval;
-
- asm volatile(
- "xchgl %0,%1"
- :"=q" (oldval), "=m" (lock->slock)
- :"0" (0) : "memory");
-
- return oldval > 0;
-}
-
-static inline void __raw_spin_unlock(__raw_spinlock_t *lock)
-{
- asm volatile("movl $1,%0" :"=m" (lock->slock) :: "memory");
-}
-
-static inline void __raw_spin_unlock_wait(__raw_spinlock_t *lock)
-{
- while (__raw_spin_is_locked(lock))
- cpu_relax();
-}
-
-/*
- * Read-write spinlocks, allowing multiple readers
- * but only one writer.
- *
- * NOTE! it is quite common to have readers in interrupts
- * but no interrupt writers. For those circumstances we
- * can "mix" irq-safe locks - any writer needs to get a
- * irq-safe write-lock, but readers can get non-irqsafe
- * read-locks.
- *
- * On x86, we implement read-write locks as a 32-bit counter
- * with the high bit (sign) being the "contended" bit.
- */
-
-static inline int __raw_read_can_lock(__raw_rwlock_t *lock)
-{
- return (int)(lock)->lock > 0;
-}
-
-static inline int __raw_write_can_lock(__raw_rwlock_t *lock)
-{
- return (lock)->lock == RW_LOCK_BIAS;
-}
-
-static inline void __raw_read_lock(__raw_rwlock_t *rw)
-{
- asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "subl $1,(%0)\n\t"
- "jns 1f\n"
- "call __read_lock_failed\n"
- "1:\n"
- ::"D" (rw), "i" (RW_LOCK_BIAS) : "memory");
-}
-
-static inline void __raw_write_lock(__raw_rwlock_t *rw)
-{
- asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "subl %1,(%0)\n\t"
- "jz 1f\n"
- "\tcall __write_lock_failed\n\t"
- "1:\n"
- ::"D" (rw), "i" (RW_LOCK_BIAS) : "memory");
-}
-
-static inline int __raw_read_trylock(__raw_rwlock_t *lock)
-{
- atomic_t *count = (atomic_t *)lock;
- atomic_dec(count);
- if (atomic_read(count) >= 0)
- return 1;
- atomic_inc(count);
- return 0;
-}
-
-static inline int __raw_write_trylock(__raw_rwlock_t *lock)
-{
- atomic_t *count = (atomic_t *)lock;
- if (atomic_sub_and_test(RW_LOCK_BIAS, count))
- return 1;
- atomic_add(RW_LOCK_BIAS, count);
- return 0;
-}
-
-static inline void __raw_read_unlock(__raw_rwlock_t *rw)
-{
- asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX " ; incl %0" :"=m" (rw->lock) : : "memory");
-}
-
-static inline void __raw_write_unlock(__raw_rwlock_t *rw)
-{
- asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX " ; addl $" RW_LOCK_BIAS_STR ",%0"
- : "=m" (rw->lock) : : "memory");
-}
-
-#define __raw_spin_relax(lock) cpu_relax()
-#define __raw_read_relax(lock) cpu_relax()
-#define __raw_write_relax(lock) cpu_relax()
-
-#endif /* __ASM_SPINLOCK_H */
diff --git a/include/asm-x86/spinlock_types.h b/include/asm-x86/spinlock_types.h
index 8b0ccbc..e7588d4 100644
--- a/include/asm-x86/spinlock_types.h
+++ b/include/asm-x86/spinlock_types.h
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ typedef struct {
unsigned int slock;
} __raw_spinlock_t;
-#define __RAW_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED { 1 }
+#define __RAW_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED { 0 }
typedef struct {
unsigned int lock;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists