[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1203611191.4071.186.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:26:30 +0000
From: Liam Girdwood <lg@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [UPDATED v2][PATCH 0/6] regulator: voltage and current
regulator framework
On Thu, 2008-02-21 at 08:41 +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 05:08:46PM +0000, Liam Girdwood wrote:
> > This patch series provides a generic framework to allow device drivers
> > to control voltage and current regulators on SoC based devices (e.g.
> > phones, gps, media players).
>
> Note that I'm explicitly avoiding commenting on this as far as PXA3xx
> devices go, until we're further down the road with PM support on that
> SoC. It's not clear at present whether a generic PMIC framework will
> be suitable for this SoC since it's my understanding from Marvell that
> we need to talk to the PMIC from IRQs-off contexts.
>
> So don't take my silence as some sort of acceptance of this code; it
> isn't.
I wasn't ;)
It then might be worth adding this functionality at a later stage when
more can be said about PXA3xx PMIC support. We could always have a
version of the _set() functions that are designed to handle this case.
In the mean time this works well on 3 other SoC CPUs.
Liam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists