| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20080221213037.GA24191@kroah.com> Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 13:30:37 -0800 From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org> Cc: Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>, Glenn Streiff <gstreiff@...Effect.com>, Faisal Latif <flatif@...Effect.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, general@...ts.openfabrics.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Subject: Re: Merging of completely unreviewed drivers On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 11:01:24PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > BTW: Greg, you are Cc'ed for your joke in [3]... > [3] http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/12/427 That was not a joke, I ment it. Do you have proof that the majority of patches going into the kernel tree are not reviewed by at least 2 people? Now they might not be 2 people that you personally like/agree with, but that's a totally different topic... And I'm with Linus on this one, it's much easier to work on driver fixes together with others, when they are in the kernel tree. Although I do like the checkpatch.pl script, it has helped me in making it easier to clean up some vendor-provided drivers recently, finding some obvious coding style issues that I had missed the first pass through. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists