[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1203631967.6112.16.camel@lappy>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 23:12:47 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Glauber Costa <gcosta@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
glommer@...il.com, mingo@...e.hu, arjan@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] make work have a static address in do_boot_cpu()
On Thu, 2008-02-21 at 17:40 -0300, Glauber Costa wrote:
> This patch makes the work field in create_idle have
> a static address. Otherwise, being a stack variable, it can
> boild down the lockdep system.
Looks way overkill. Doesn't something like:
> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@...hat.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/smpboot_64.c | 13 +++++++------
> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot_64.c
> index f15b774..d79b7a8 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot_64.c
> @@ -553,12 +554,12 @@ static int __cpuinit do_boot_cpu(int cpu
> unsigned long boot_error;
> int timeout;
> unsigned long start_rip;
> struct create_idle create_idle = {
> - .work = __WORK_INITIALIZER(create_idle.work, do_fork_idle),
> .cpu = cpu,
> .done = COMPLETION_INITIALIZER_ONSTACK(create_idle.done),
> };
> + INIT_WORK(&create_idle.work, do_fork_idle);
work?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists