[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47BD14AC.5070002@nigel.suspend2.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 17:05:32 +1100
From: Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...el.suspend2.net>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
CC: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
Jesse Barnes <jesse.barnes@...el.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@...il.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
suspend-devel List <suspend-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc2 System no longer powers off after suspend-to-disk.
Screen becomes green.
Hi Greg.
Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 12:17:06PM +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> Greg KH wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 11:40:06AM +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
>>>> Hi.
>>>>
>>>> Matthew Garrett wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 09:45:02AM +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
>>>>>> - people keep talking about hibernating to an ext3 fs mounted on fuse
>>>>>> as a limitation of the freezer. To do that with kexec, you're still
>>>>>> going to have to bmap the ext3 fs and pass the block list (in which
>>>>>> case we can also do it without kexec) or umount all the ext3/fuse part
>>>>>> and remount in the kexec'd kernel. Sort of defeats the purpose, doesn't
>>>>>> it?
>>>>> No, with a freezer-based model you can basically *never* suspend to
>>>>> anything related to FUSE or a userspace USB device or anything involving
>>>>> userspace iSCSI initiators or whatever. Sure, there are cases where
>>>>> moving away from the current model doesn't buy you anything, but that
>>>>> doesn't mean that the current model is a good thing. It's not. The
>>>>> freezer is a fundamentally broken concept.
>>>> Putting drivers and filesystems in userspace is the fundamentally broken
>>>> concept. Not just when it comes to the freezer. The whole idea is
>>>> inherently racy.
>>> Racy with regards to other things becides trying to suspend a machine?
>>> If so, what?
>> That depends on what sort of tangled web you want to weave.
>
> Lots of them :)
>
> We have tanks running Linux using userspace USB drivers for vision
> control systems (scary, I know...) They seem to be successfully running
> for many years now, and I'm interested in making sure those kinds of
> things keep working.
>
> We also have laser welding robots with userspace PCI drivers in car
> manufacturing plants. And other laser cutting robots slicing wood in
> patterns moving at a rate of over 3 meters a second. Again, with
> userspace drivers and Linux.
>
> Those users would also love to know of any potential problems you know
> of for this situation.
>
>> Low memory situations is one other situation that occurs to me
>> quickly, especially (though not only) if your ability to swap were to
>> depend upon a userspace driver and/or filesystem.
>
> Sure, swap over a userspace filesystem or driver isn't a sane idea. And
> neither is swaping over NFS over a PPP connection attached to a USB to
> serial device. Yes, it's possible, and all in the kernel, but not a
> wise decision.
>
> Other than foolish configurations, if you come up with other issues
> surrounding userspace drivers that could cause problems, please let me
> know.
A simple OOM condition isn't an issue? Surely a driver stalling because
some of its memory gets swapped out just before it goes to use it would
be a problem if it resulted in getting the length of a cut wrong or
caused some distorted vision or a late turn :>
Am I missing something? Maybe these drivers mlock memory to avoid those
issues or something like that?
Regards,
Nigel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists