linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] kgdb: fixes and ARCH=arm support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080221062215.GA10172@elte.hu>
Date:	Thu, 21 Feb 2008 07:22:15 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] kgdb: fixes and ARCH=arm support

* Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com> wrote:

> Here are 3 more patches against the kgdb-light.  Porting kgdb-light to 
> another arch has found 2 regressions, which are fixed in the first 
> patch.
> 
> The second patch adds hooks for an additional kgdboc uart driver which 
> was required to complete the testing with real hardware.
> 
> The third patch adds the ARCH=arm support for kgdb-light.

thanks Jason. I've merged all 3 into the kgdb-light tree to ease 
testing.

I think we should also try to do some self-tests, so that when one boots 
a bzImage with the self-tests activated it can be said that all the 
basic functionality works. Simulated via some loopback method, from 
within the kernel - not via a real serial line - but it should have the 
capability to do real single-stepping and inject real hw breakpoints and 
test that they work. What do you think?

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/