[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080222121751.GA17889@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 13:17:51 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: Regression [Was: Boot hang with stack protector on x86_64]
* James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org> wrote:
> > works fine for you? That has all the current stackprotector fixes. I
> > plan to send a separate pull request with just the stackprotector
> > fixes to Linus, they are looking good in testing so far.
>
> Nope, same problem.
>
> (I followed your instructions in the readme exactly).
stupid double check, does "git-log | grep stackpro" give you the fixes:
This patch adds a simple self-test capability to the stackprotector
x86: unify stackprotector features
streamline the stackprotector features under a single option
x86: stackprotector: mix TSC to the boot canary
x86: fix the stackprotector canary of the boot CPU
stackprotector: add boot_init_stack_canary()
stackprotector: include files
?
Please send me your full .config and the gcc version you used for
building the failing kernel.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists