[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080222133541.GA8868@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 14:35:41 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: gregory.haskins@...il.com
Cc: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
tglx@...utronix.de, rostedt@...dmis.org,
linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bill.huey@...il.com, kevin@...man.org, cminyard@...sta.com,
dsingleton@...sta.com, dwalker@...sta.com, npiggin@...e.de,
dsaxena@...xity.net, ak@...e.de, gregkh@...e.de,
sdietrich@...ell.com, pmorreale@...ell.com, mkohari@...ell.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH [RT] 05/14] rearrange rt_spin_lock sleep
* Gregory Haskins <gregory.haskins.ml@...il.com> wrote:
> My assumption is that the xchg() (inside update_current()) acts as an
> effective wmb(). If xchg() does not have this property, then this
> code is broken and patch 6/14 should also add a:
xchg() is a strong implicit memory barrier, it implies smp_mb().
(historic sidenote: it was the very first SMP primitive we had in
Linux.)
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists