[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080222161256.GA1773@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:12:56 +0100
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: Regression [Was: Boot hang with stack protector on x86_64]
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 07:43:08AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 22 Feb 2008, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> >
> > This is a regression. Can you please revert this commit.
>
> Not really. The thing is, CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR has never done anything
> at all, now it does, and it shows that it never worked.
And this made a machine non-bootable that could boot before.
>
> So the commit that made it do something shouldn't be reverted, but
> CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR should be marked BROKEN, because it obviously is
> broken right now.
>
> But keeping the config option, and just not making it do anything is
> misleading and wrong.
>
> So just something like this? To make sure normal people don't enable it..
Whatever is fine with me - I hope Ingo & Co fixes the root cause soon so
we can get the right fix in.
Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists