| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 11:01:24 -0500 (EST) From: Rick Macklem <rick@...white.cis.uoguelph.ca> To: Dan.Muntz@...app.com Cc: casey@...aufler-ca.com, dhowells@...hat.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, nfsv4@...ux-nfs.org, phillips@...nq.net, selinux@...ho.nsa.gov, Trond.Myklebust@...app.com Subject: RE: [PATCH 00/37] Permit filesystem local caching > Well, the AFS paper that was referenced earlier was written around the > time of 10bt and 100bt. Local disk caching worked well then. There > should also be some papers at CITI about disk caching over slower > connections, and disconnected operation (which should still be > applicable today). There are still winners from local disk caching, but > their numbers have been reduced. Server load reduction should be a win. > I'm not sure if it's worth it from a security/manageability standpoint, > but I haven't looked that closely at David's code. One area that you might want to look at is WAN performance. When RPC RTT goes up, ordinary NFS performance goes down. This tends to get overlooked by the machine room folks. (There are several tools out there that can introduce delay in an IP packet stream and emulate WAN RTTs.) Just a thought, rick -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists