linux-kernel - Re: [BUILD_FAILURE] 2.6.25-rc2-mm1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 22 Feb 2008 10:13:44 -0800
From:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc:	Nish Aravamudan <nish.aravamudan@...il.com>,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>
Subject: Re: [BUILD_FAILURE] 2.6.25-rc2-mm1 - Build Failure at acpi_os

On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 19:08:15 +0100 Sam Ravnborg wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 05:38:52PM -0800, Nish Aravamudan wrote:
> > On 2/21/08, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 10:54:40AM -0800, Nish Aravamudan wrote:
> > >  > On 2/20/08, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org> wrote:
> > >  > > On Saturday 16 February 2008 14:47, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
> > >  > >  > Hi Andrew,
> > >  > >  >
> > >  > >  > The 2.6.25-rc2-mm1 kernel with randconfig build option, fails
> > >  > >  > to build on x86_64 machine
> > >  > >  >
> > >  > >  >   CC      drivers/acpi/osl.o
> > >  > >  > drivers/acpi/osl.c:60:38: error: empty filename in #include
> > >  > >  > drivers/acpi/osl.c: In function 'acpi_os_table_override':
> > >  > >  > drivers/acpi/osl.c:399: error: 'AmlCode' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > >  > >  > drivers/acpi/osl.c:399: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> > >  > >  > drivers/acpi/osl.c:399: error: for each function it appears in.)
> > >  > >  > make[2]: *** [drivers/acpi/osl.o] Error 1
> > >  > >  > make[1]: *** [drivers/acpi] Error 2
> > >  > >  > make: *** [drivers] Error 2
> > >  > >  >
> > >  > >  > #
> > >  > >  > # Automatically generated make config: don't edit
> > >  > >  > # Linux kernel version: 2.6.25-rc2-mm1
> > >  > >  > # Sun Feb 17 08:07:17 2008
> > >  > >  > #
> > >  > >
> > >  > >
> > >  > > > CONFIG_ACPI_CUSTOM_DSDT=y
> > >  > >  > CONFIG_ACPI_CUSTOM_DSDT_FILE=""
> > >  > >
> > >  > >
> > >  > > garbage in, garbage out.
> > >  >
> > >  > garbage explicitly *allowed* by Kconfig in this case, though.
> > >  >
> > >  > >  If you don't give this build option a file name where AmlCode lives,
> > >  > >  then the build will be unable to find AmlCode[].
> > >  > >
> > >  > >  http://www.lesswatts.org/projects/acpi/overridingDSDT.php
> > >  >
> > >  > So we have a .config option whose sole purpose is to use another
> > >  > .config option? That seems ... less than ideal. Is there not some
> > >  > Kconfig voodoo we can do to only require the one option? Maybe
> > >  > something like how CONFIG_INITRAMFS_SOURCE is done? Adding Sam to the
> > >  > Cc, in case he has any ideas.
> > >
> > >
> > > Make sure STANDALONE is y for your randconfig builds.
> > >  See README for examples.
> > 
> > Hrm, if this is needed for randconfig to work, perhaps randconfig
> > itself should somehow be specifying it?
> > 
> > >  STANALONE is there exactly to prevent the above but we cannot
> > >  control randconfig.
> > 
> > While setting STANDALONE does fix the above, it doesn't answer the
> > more basic question I had -- do we really need both .config options in
> > this case? If it's simply a case of "That's how it is, won't be fixed,
> > there are higher priorities", that's good enough by me. Just seems a
> > shame that we have an option to enable another option, which is
> > required for the first option to be sensible -- seems like we should
> > only need the second option...
> 
> I really do not see what problem you are trying to address.
> 
> STANDALONE is there as an easy way to turn of the options that requires
> sensible input to make a kernel compile.
> 
> And that makes _perfect_ sense when you do randconfig builds.


> CONFIG_ACPI_CUSTOM_DSDT=y
> CONFIG_ACPI_CUSTOM_DSDT_FILE=""

Is there a way to generate (in Kconfig language) the boolean
CONFIG_ACPI_CUSTOM_DSDT based on whether CONFIG_ACPI_CUSTOM_DSDT_FILE
== "" or != "" ?  I tried to muck around with that last night but
couldn't get it to work.  I.e., just present the ACPI_CUSTOM_DSDT_FILE
config symbol to the user and then generate the ACPI_CUSTOM_DSDT bool
based on the string value.


---
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/