linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86_64: make amd quad core 8 socket system not be clustered

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 22 Feb 2008 11:08:20 -0800
From:	Yinghai Lu <Yinghai.Lu@....COM>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: make amd quad core 8 socket system not be
 clustered_box

On Friday 22 February 2008 11:02:30 am Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Friday 22 February 2008 04:25:18 am Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Yinghai Lu <Yinghai.Lu@....COM> writes:
> > 
> > > quad core 8 socket system will have apic id lifting.the apic id range could
> > > be [4, 0x23]. or [8, 0x27]. apic_is_clustered_box will think that need to three clusters
> > > and that is large than 2. So it is treated as clustered_box.
> > >
> > > and will get
> > >
> > > Marking TSC unstable due to TSCs unsynchronized
> > >
> > > even the CPUs have X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC set.
> > >
> > > this patch offset back the apic before get apic clusterid.
> > >
> > > or use dmi to get apic_is_clustered?
> > 
> > The clustered check is for Summit and es7000 systems
> > On 64bit systems it might be actually possible to trigger
> > this based on SLIT instead. But you'll need to check with
> > the IBM Summit/Unisys es7000 developers if that works or not
> > 
> > If you don't want to do that the safer way would be probably
> > the check if there are holes between the CPUs APIC numbers.
> > If yes then it's likely clustered mode. I think that would
> > be better than to disable it unconditionally for apic lifting
> > like your patches does.
> 
> so for that box [4, 0x23] still could be apic clustered? there is a hole [0,3]..
> 
> is their box using AMD cpu or not?

or move
CPUs have X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC check before apic_clustered check?

YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/