[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47BF20B0.6090203@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 20:21:20 +0100
From: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
To: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] char: fix possible double-unlock in esp.c
On 02/22/2008 06:34 PM, Harvey Harrison wrote:
> Hitting either of the break statements in the while loop would cause
> a double-unlock of info->lock. Add an out label and goto instead of
> break to skip the unlock in those cases.
>
> Noticed by sparse:
> drivers/char/esp.c:2042:2: warning: context imbalance in 'rs_wait_until_sent' - unexpected unlock
>
> Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/char/esp.c | 5 +++--
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/esp.c b/drivers/char/esp.c
> index 01fbddd..2b14814 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/esp.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/esp.c
> @@ -2030,16 +2030,17 @@ static void rs_wait_until_sent(struct tty_struct *tty, int timeout)
> msleep_interruptible(jiffies_to_msecs(char_time));
guarantees current state be running after it returns either interrupted or not.
>
> if (signal_pending(current))
> - break;
> + goto out;
just return;
> if (timeout && time_after(jiffies, orig_jiffies + timeout))
> - break;
> + goto out;
detto
> spin_lock_irqsave(&info->lock, flags);
> serial_out(info, UART_ESI_CMD1, ESI_NO_COMMAND);
> serial_out(info, UART_ESI_CMD1, ESI_GET_TX_AVAIL);
> }
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&info->lock, flags);
> +out:
> set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
no need for this.
> }
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists