linux-kernel - [2.6 patch] pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv_acpi.c: remove unneeded NULL check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080222195847.GK1409@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi>
Date:	Fri, 22 Feb 2008 21:58:47 +0200
From:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
To:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc:	Andrew Patterson <andrew.patterson@...com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz
Subject: [2.6 patch] pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv_acpi.c: remove unneeded NULL check

On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 08:09:35AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 09:56:28AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 09:47:58PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 09:29:02PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > > The Coverity checker spotted the following inconsequent NULL checking 
> > > > introduced by commit 3c75e23784e6ed5f4841de43d0750fd9b37bafcb:
> > > > 
> > > > <--  snip  -->
> > > > 
> > > > ...
> > > > int aer_osc_setup(struct pcie_device *pciedev)
> > > > {
> > > > ...            vvvvvvvvv
> > > >         while (pdev->bus && pdev->bus->self)
> > > >                 pdev = pdev->bus->self;
> > > 
> > > That could probably change to just pdev->bus->self, as a bus should
> > > always be there for a pdev, so I don't see this as a problem.
> > 
> > I'm not claiming this specific case was a problem.
> 
> Well, Coverity did :)

It only said it's once checked and once not.

> > When a NULL check is only performed in some cases that's sometimes a bug 
> > that has to be fixed and in most cases a not required check that should 
> > be removed at some point in time.
> 
> I agree, patches are always welcome...

Patch below.

> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

cu
Adrian


<--  snip  -->


There's no reason for checking pdev->bus for being NULL here (and we'd 
anyway Oops 3 lines below if it was).

Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>

---
74832021c82be6e2ed6055f4f25dbf152df67cf5 diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv_acpi.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv_acpi.c
index 8c199ae..1e2a858 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv_acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv_acpi.c
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ int aer_osc_setup(struct pcie_device *pciedev)
 	acpi_handle handle = 0;
 
 	/* Find root host bridge */
-	while (pdev->bus && pdev->bus->self)
+	while (pdev->bus->self)
 		pdev = pdev->bus->self;
 	handle = acpi_get_pci_rootbridge_handle(
 		pci_domain_nr(pdev->bus), pdev->bus->number);

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/